Our First Book

A Self-publishing Journey Begins

The book is now available to order at:  http://www.artistasylum.com/book/h7b12a9f3#h7b12a9f3


If you had asked me 15 years ago if we were going to publish a photography book, I would have responded with a strange look and a question answering your question… “Why?”


Just like I asked our cat while she was walking on the proof from the printer. Why?

I’ve been a student of photography, as I’ve heard many other photographers claim, since the beginning when I first realized I had a connection to the art of the process. Photography is a process, both in action and in spirit. Like the force in Star Wars, it is energy “created by all living things, it surrounds us, it penetrates us, it binds the galaxy together.” And if you consider the Voyager mission, that quote is not so far off.


So, while all the photography outings with my Dad when I was a kid were more to go for a ride on the Honda, I think subconsciously he set into motion this feeling I discovered back in the decade after college, but always knew I had. In high school, I had a camera. In college, I had a camera. During all the Summers in Leland, I had a camera. I have a milk crate filled to the top with slides and negatives dating back to the early 1980’s.

Honda 175

The infamous Honda 175, great for “field trips”, literally.

My Dad’s journey was different. He was introduced to photography indirectly by his step-father, Charlie Kluk. Charlie left Dad a pile of 3×5 negatives that Dad wanted to print, so he set up an ad-hoc dark room on the back porch of his Grandparent’s house in North Riverside, IL.


One of the 3×5 negatives from Charlie Kluk’s album. Keith is on the right.


Keith and his Mother, Garnet


The Leica M3


Photo care of http://www.sl66.com/

Keith didn’t actually get a camera until 1955 when he lived in California. Still, he didn’t catch the photography bug until later, when he started coming to Leland regularly in the early 60s. At that time, he was using my mother’s Leica M3. He used that in Leland up until the 70’s. He also used a Rollie SL66 medium-format camera. He developed and printed from his own negatives in a darkroom in Riverside. Later, with a Nikon FT, he would ride the countryside on his orange Honda 175 looking for landscapes. Still later, armed with a Nikon 6006 35mm camera, he would take slides of the Leland Yacht Club’s Barbecruise day, develop them in the bathroom of the Beach House and mount them for display the same night at the barbeque. Anyone who knows what goes into taking, developing and mounting slides same day at home can attest to this herculean task. The afternoon was filled with a cadre of volunteers cutting and mounting the slides for the show at the evening BBQ.

Nikon FT complete with funkidelic 70's strap

Nikon FT complete with funkidelic 70’s strap

Our paths were similar, where he left off, I picked up. When 35mm systems became affordable, my Dad sold his Rollei and bought a Nikon FT system complete with lenses. I have one of those Nikon FTs already loaded with a roll of film. When I got it, it had 12 frames already exposed. I am dying to develop it to find out what they are. I just have to take 12 more frames. My evolution started with the same FT that he gave me. He taught me how to take a bulk spool of Kodak black and white film and custom load my own cartridges. You have to do it by feel and sound and in complete darkness. I still have a spool of Fuji Velvia ASA 50 film. That might be what goes into the FT when I finish the roll. I bought the Ansel Adams five book series on photography. I took a night class with Kirk Kruetzig and finished a full course on photography and the New York Institute of Photography.

After that, I shot with one of Dad’s old Nikon 6006s. That was my first automatic SLR, sort of a learning system. After that, I bought my own N80. At the same time, digital cameras were just starting to come on the scene. The best ones had 1.5 Megapixels of resolution. My first was a Kodak DC290 in 2000, which had 2.1 megapixels. It was actually a really good camera for the time. I think Kodak dropped the ball entering the market and lost a lot of ground catching up. But film was still king. The majority of what I shot was still on film. The DC290 was a toy. At the same time, my Dad bought his first digital camera, a Nikon CoolPix 990. That had 3.1 megapixels, but it was still a “point and shoot” camera. That was a year before we started the Leland Report. Most of what was shot for the Leland Report from 2001-2003 was from the 990. The 990 worked so well I bought the next generation 995. On 9/15/03 Dad switched to a Nikon D100, the first advanced consumer grade digital SLR for our family. Six megapixels allowed us to offer bigger prints. Being able to change lenses gave us more options.


I took this picture with my Nikon N80 film camera of Keith on Clay Cliffs taking a picture with the Nikon 990 digital in 3/14/03 when Lake Michigan was 100% ice covered.

Here is the photo he was taking at the time!

Here is the photo he was taking at the time!

First Leland Report with the D100. 6 megapixels of goodness 9/15/2003.

At that point I believe my Dad was officially off film. No more long stints in the darkroom or nasty chemicals, but he had moved to Leland by that time and didn’t have that luxury anymore (was it really considered a luxury?). However, I was still shooting film. I had more to learn. I dived deeply into every part of the workflow, learning how to not only take the photos, but scan the slides and negatives and print them myself. I, like all photographers who print their own work, struggled with matching monitor images to prints. The struggle made me more determined to make the digital process work. I took all the photos of my kids as babies with a film camera and scanned the negatives and slides into digital form. I did all my “darkroom” in digital. At the same time, I took all the photos of my daughter’s birth with a disposable camera. I was still writing down my image exposures in a notebook for reference later. There was a better way coming.

When I bought my first “pro-sumer” Nikon digital D70s in 2005, I officially dropped film. 6 megapixels was plenty for prints. No more waiting a week for developing AND all the image exposure data is saved with the file. I’ve been 100% digital since. However, I am glad I suffered with film for as long as I did, it makes me appreciate digital that much more.


Taken with the Nikon E990 (3 megapixels) for the Leland Report on 6/10/2001

Taken last July with the iPhone

Taken last July with the iPhone which, at 8 megapixels, has over twice the resolution of the old Nikon E990


Taken with the Nikon D3200 which, at 24 megapixels, has 3 times the resolution of the iPhone

The evolution of the Leland Report was in step with the evolution of digital photography itself. It was born from digital photography and the internet. It has grown with digital. Who knows where it will go. We’ve gone from 3 to 24 megapixels, but you would be hard pressed to know the difference unless you zoomed in on the photos. At present, Keith uses a combination of an iPhone, a Sony compact and a Nikon 3200 while I have a D7100. Meggen Watt Petersen, who has impressed us with her Monday shots is using a D800. Regardless of the camera technology, we have created a library of beautiful images. In the right hands, even the worst cameras can be used to make good photographs. But a book? That’s a different animal. For that, you have to find a publisher, negotiate deals, hire out layout artists, writers, editors. It all seemed very daunting when we were first approached by Mackinac Island Press 10 years ago. At that time I didn’t feel like we had enough of a library or reputation to dare a photography book. Being a popular website does not always translate into a book. But I dragged my feet. Mackinac Island Press went bankrupt or was bought by another publisher, I don’t know, but they went away. I thought I missed my chance back in 2007.

TheLelandReportLogoTM2prod_cal2016[1]About a year ago I had an epiphany. I realized in giving my Dad this platform to which he can advertise this region by way of his talents, I managed to create a brand. Also, people who recognize Biscuit and get their picture taken with him reinforce that brand. It was so much that I added Biscuit to the Leland Report Logo when we switched to the new blogging platform. I remembered I was now sitting on 14 years of wonderful images. Despite people asking about the possibility of a book, I was not in a position career-wise to dedicate time to that. After I switched jobs to something closer to home without the overnight support annoyances, I had an additional 10 hours a week. The time was right for the book. I had been laying out the calendar from scratch for seven years, so if I can do that, how hard could 116 pages be?

Keith, of course, has a majority of the photos in the book. I have close to 20, but I could not forget the contributions of Meggen Watt Petersen, whose Monday posts have delighted us for over a year now. She wrote the section on Fishtown and I included a couple of her great shots on the subject.

The proof print for the cover

The proof print for the cover

This book was a bare bones effort. I reviewed over 20,000 photos, chose the best and laid it out in InDesign. When I finally showed it to a publisher they suggested, since I had most of the work done already, that I self publish. I got some invaluable advice from Steven Klein who is a retired publisher. Thanks goes to Leelanau Press publisher Barbara Siepker for that referral. My sister Julie Burnham edited it. Meggen, Sandra Serra Bradshaw and Mark Smith contributed some of the written chapters. And as a bonus, Susan Ager agreed to write the Foreword. We also included some interesting quotes from our good friend Bill Hahn from “near Chelsea, MI”. The book is currently at the printers and the final proof has been approved. It shouldn’t be long now before they start. It’s not quite ready for pre-sale yet, however. Patience. 😉

I’ll write another chapter on this later on what went into laying out the book.  Thanks for reading! Let me know your thoughts!

Jim Burnham

12 thoughts on “Our First Book

  1. john frank

    This very interesting article caused me to mentally re-live my own photographic “evolution,” starting with my little plastic “Donald Duck” camera in the 1940s (twelve Black-And-White images each 24 mm — one inch — square on each roll of size 127 Verichrome film), through a succession of better equipment, up to my present Panasonic ZF200 Super-Zoom digital. I had found that the big heavy leather case containing my SLR film camera with its family of lenses and accessories was nearly always in the closet back home; my new Super-Zoom with its Leica lens is always with me!
    I helped my daughter organize and lay out 127 photos, mostly quite old, in her self-published book covering 13 generations of family history (going back to 1596!). The primary PhotoShop chore was to get a more-or-less uniform level of contrast and lightness in the old historic photos.
    Thanks for the memories!

  2. Old Tank Driver

    I am hoping we could send a copy or two to heaven where all our fore fathers woud have a chance to see has gone on since they left us. What a treat. Thanks.

  3. Virginia Hogan

    Very interesting reading. As a person uneducated in this field, it’s amazing to learn what-all goes into photography and a book like this. I was glad to read that Susan Ager will be involved – it was her article in the Free Press years ago that alerted me to this web site and I’ve been following it ever since. I can hardly wait for the finished product – it will make a wonderful present for those who love this area – but me first!

  4. Merry Ball

    Congratulations. We at Good Old Books will be happy to carry your book because it is indeed a rare treasure.

  5. Dave Cater

    Oh my! How interesting!! Reading material like this just adds to the intrigue and specialness of “The Land of Delight.” Please, more!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.